Lay v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
Plaintiff: Wade Lay
Defendant: Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Anita Trammell, Keith Sherwood and Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Case Number: 6:2013cv00481
Filed: October 24, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma
Office: Muskogee Office
County: Pittsburg
Presiding Judge: Steven P. Shreder
Presiding Judge: Ronald A. White
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 19, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 124 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Ronald A. White : Defendants Oklahoma State Penitentiary, the Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Terry Royal, in his official capacity, and Keith Sherwood, in his official capacity, are dismissed without prejudice, pursua nt to Eleventh Amendment immunity. Defendants Anita Trammell and Keith Sherwood, in their individual capacities, are dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Furthermore, Plaintiffs request for injunctive relief and all remaining pending motions are denied. This dismissal shall count as a strike, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 110 111 112 116 117 (case terminated) (acg, Deputy Clerk)
March 16, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 89 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Ronald A. White : Granting 40 Motion to Dismiss. This action is, in all respects, DISMISSED as frivolous. This shall count as a STRIKE, pursuant to 28 U.C.C. 1915(g).(case terminated) (acg, Deputy Clerk)
November 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 16 OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Steven P. Shreder : Plaintiff is directed to submit within fourteen (14) days a second amended complaint on the courts civil rights form that complies with Rule 8(a)(2). striking document(s) (Re: 12 Amended Complaint ) (acg, Deputy Clerk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lay v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wade Lay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Anita Trammell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Keith Sherwood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?