Henderson v. Farris

Petitioner: Mikel Ray Henderson
Respondent: Jim Farris
Case Number: 6:2015cv00080
Filed: February 26, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma
Office: Muskogee Office
County: Love
Presiding Judge: Kimberly E. West
Presiding Judge: Frank H. Seay
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 19, 2016 Filing 14 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Frank H. Seay : Granting 5 Motion to Dismiss. Transferring case to 10th Circuit Court (re: 2nd or Successive 2254/2255 Petition) (case terminated) (acg, Deputy Clerk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Henderson v. Farris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Mikel Ray Henderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jim Farris
Represented By: Diane L. Slayton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?