Reirdon v. XTO Energy, Inc.
Plaintiff: Dorsey J. Reirdon
Defendant: XTO Energy, Inc.
Case Number: 6:2016cv00087
Filed: March 4, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma
Office: Muskogee Office
County: Marshall
Presiding Judge: James H. Payne
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reirdon v. XTO Energy, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dorsey J. Reirdon
Represented By: Bradley E. Beckworth
Represented By: Michael Burrage
Represented By: Trey Duck
Represented By: John C. Hull
Represented By: Paula M. Jantzen
Represented By: Lawrence R. Murphy, Jr
Represented By: Andrew G. Pate
Represented By: Mariann M. Robison
Represented By: Jason A. Ryan
Represented By: Patrick M. Ryan
Represented By: Phillip G. Whaley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: XTO Energy, Inc.
Represented By: Mark Banner
Represented By: Christopher A. Brown
Represented By: Jeffrey C. King
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?