Gray v. Sorrels et al
| Frederick Gray |
| Patricia Sorrels, David Marlar, Buddy Honaker, Howard, Susan Shields, Patricia Stem, William Taylor, Nancy Corpel, Amber Robinson, Alicia Scull and Brian Holden |
| 6:2016cv00145 |
| April 20, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma |
| Muskogee Office |
| Pittsburg |
| Steven P. Shreder |
| Ronald A. White |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
113
OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Ronald A. White : Granting 102 defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, and this case if DISMISSSED in its entirety. (acg, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing
77
OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Ronald A. White : Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED 64 for Plaintiff's failure to state a claim under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Defendants in their official capacities are DISMIS SED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, Defendants in their individual capacities are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and Plaintiffs request for injunctive relief is DENIED. This dismissal shall count as a prior occasion or strike, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). (acg, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing
56
OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Ronald A. White : Denying 11 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order; denying 11 Motion for Permanent Injunction ; denying 13 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. (acg, Deputy Clerk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
