Reirdon v. Cimarex Energy Company et al
| Dorsey J. Reirdon |
| Cimarex Energy Company and Cimarex Energy Co. of Colorado |
| 6:2016cv00445 |
| October 14, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma |
| Muskogee Office |
| Marshall |
| Steven P. Shreder |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
100
OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Steven P. Shreder granting in part and denying in part 83 Defendants' Partial Motion for Summary Judgment On Plaintiff's Non-Contract Claims. (tls, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing
98
OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Steven P. Shreder denying 55 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment on All Claims Associated with the Beard Leases. (tls, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing
42
OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Steven P. Shreder granting in part and denying in part 25 Partial Motion to Dismiss Case for Failure to State a Claim. The motion is GRANTED as to Counts II (Tortious Breach of Contract) and IV (Fraud (Actual and Constructive) and Deceit), and DENIED as to Counts III (Unjust Enrichment), V (Accounting), and VI (Injunction). Furthermore, Count II (Tortious Breach of Contract) is dismissed with prejudice and Court IV (Fraud (Actual and Constructive) and Deceit) is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff is given fourteen (14) days to file an Amended Complaint. (ndd, Deputy Clerk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
