Davis v. Adelita's Cafe
Aubrey Davis and Audrey Davis |
Adelita's Cafe |
6:2018cv00202 |
July 2, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma |
Muskogee Office |
McIntosh |
Kimberly E West |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued by Court Clerk as to Adelita's Cafe (jcb, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk, directing Plaintiff to pay the filing fee of $400 within 7 days or file a Motion for Informa Pauperis. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this directive will subject this action to immediate dismissal by the Court without prejudice to refiling. NOTE: The court cannot issue summons until the filing fee is paid. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the court's PDF version and email it to CM-ECFIntake_OKED@oked.uscourts.gov. Consent forms provided to filing party. (Filing Fee due by 7/9/2018)(jcb, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Adelita's Cafe by Audrey Davis (jcb, Deputy Clerk) Modified on 7/3/2018 to correct party name(jcb, Deputy Clerk). |
Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Audrey Davis (jcb, Deputy Clerk) Modified on 7/3/2018 to correct party name (jcb, Deputy Clerk). |
FILING FEES Paid in Full on 7/2/2018 in the amount of $400, receipt number 1086-1188284 (Re: #2 Complaint ) by Audrey Davis (Smolen, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.