Cross v. United States Marshal Service et al
| Adrian Cross |
| David Anderson, David L. Harlow, Lloyd Vellek and United States Marshal Service |
| 6:2018cv00327 |
| October 1, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma |
| Dale A Kimball |
| Ronald A White |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk: Pursuant to the recusal of Judge Ronald A. White and at the direction of the Court, this case is hereby reassigned to United States District Judge Dale A. Kimball of the District of Utah, serving in this case by designation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 292(b). All documents filed in this case in the future shall reflect the new case number CIV-18-327-DAK (tls, Deputy Clerk) Modified on 11/28/2018 to edit text; NEF regenerated (tls, Deputy Clerk). |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Adrian Cross. Responses due by 10/15/2018 (pjw, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by Adrian Cross. Responses due by 10/15/2018 (pjw, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against David Anderson, David L. Harlow, United States Marshal Service, Lloyd Vellek by Adrian Cross (With attachments) (pjw, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Adrian Cross (pjw, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
