Clark v. State of Oklahoma
Petitioner: William Jay Clark
Respondent: State of Oklahoma
Case Number: 6:2018cv00382
Filed: November 27, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: Kimberly E West
Referring Judge: Ronald A White
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER by Judge Ronald A. White, referring case to Magistrate Judge Kimberly E. West for all further proceedings in accordance with jurisdiction pursuant to 28 USC 636. All future filings shall bear the case number CIV-18-382-RAW-KEW. (acg, Deputy Clerk)
November 27, 2018 Filing 7 CASE TRANSFERRED IN from the Texas Northern
November 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE: It is therefore ORDERED that the case be, and it is hereby, TRANSFERRED to the Eastern District of Oklahoma. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr on 11/27/2018) (skg) [Transferred from txnd on 11/27/2018.]
November 27, 2018 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Tue Nov 27 12:05:16 CST 2018 (crt) [Transferred from txnd on 11/27/2018.]
November 26, 2018 Filing 5 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (skg) [Transferred from txnd on 11/27/2018.]
November 26, 2018 Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: No court file needed. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Ray (see Special Order 3). Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ray). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (skg) [Transferred from txnd on 11/27/2018.]
November 26, 2018 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to File Extra Pages With Application filed by William Jay Clark. (skg) [Transferred from txnd on 11/27/2018.]
November 26, 2018 Filing 2 Memorandum in Support filed by William Jay Clark re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (skg) [Transferred from txnd on 11/27/2018.]
November 26, 2018 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by William Jay Clark. (Filing fee $5.00; receipt number WF002695) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s)) (skg) [Transferred from txnd on 11/27/2018.]
November 26, 2018 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4, 5. Mon Nov 26 16:50:42 CST 2018 (crt) [Transferred from txnd on 11/27/2018.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Clark v. State of Oklahoma
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: William Jay Clark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: State of Oklahoma
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?