Heuangavilay v. Nielsen et al
| Ninkom Heuangavilay |
| Barbara Owlett, William P. Barr and Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen |
| 6:2019cv00111 |
| April 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma |
| Ronald A White |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
MINUTE ORDER by District Judge Ronald A. White Upon review of the file in this case, the Court finds that the petitioner has not submitted a proper motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis or paid the $5.00 filing fee. The petitioner is directed to submit a properly executed motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, with original signature and have the Trust Fund Officer at his/her facility complete (with an original signature) the Required Certification of Statement of Institutional Accounts and provide a current 6-month financial accounting statement and return the completed motion to the Office of the Clerk or pay the filing fee of $5.00 within 20 days or by April 29, 2018. The Clerk is directed to provide the petitioner with a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis form and an instruction sheet (jcb, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241 by Ninkom Heuangavilay (With attachments)(jcb, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
