Mead v. Dowling
Petitioner: William Claude Mead
Respondent: Janet Dowling
Case Number: 6:2019cv00426
Filed: December 19, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: James H Payne
Referring Judge: Kimberly E West
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kimberly E. West: Granting #8 Motion to Withdraw Attorney, Sheri M. Johnson.(acg, Deputy Clerk)
February 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kimberly E. West: Granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Motion. Responses due by 3/12/2020 (Re: #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254 ) (acg, Deputy Clerk)
February 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Motion (Re: #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254 ) by Janet Dowling Responses due by 2/26/2020(Pittman, Julie)
January 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MOTION to Withdraw Attorney(s) by Janet Dowling Responses due by 2/10/2020(Johnson, Sheri)
January 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Julie Pittman on behalf of Janet Dowling (Pittman, Julie)
January 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Sheri M. Johnson on behalf of Janet Dowling (Johnson, Sheri)
January 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER by District Judge James H. Payne, referring case to Magistrate Judge Kimberly E. West for all further proceedings in accordance with jurisdiction pursuant to 28 USC 636. All future filings shall bear the case number CIV-19-426-JHP-KEW. (acg, Deputy Clerk)
January 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kimberly E. West, directing Respondent to show cause why the writ should not issue and file a response to the petition( Responses due by 2/12/2020.) (Re: #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254 ) (acg, Deputy Clerk)
January 10, 2020 Opinion or Order FILING FEES Paid in Full on 1/10/2020 in the amount of $5, receipt number 17610 (Re: #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254) by William Claude Mead (pjw, Deputy Clerk)
December 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER by District Judge James H. Payne: Denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, Initial Filing Fee due by 1/20/2020(acg, Deputy Clerk)
December 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by William Claude Mead Responses due by 1/2/2020(acg, Deputy Clerk)
December 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254 by William Claude Mead (With attachments)(acg, Deputy Clerk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mead v. Dowling
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Janet Dowling
Represented By: Sheri M. Johnson
Represented By: Julie Pittman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: William Claude Mead
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?