Commander v. Pettigrew
| James Willis Commander |
| United States of America and Luke Pettigrew |
| 6:2020cv00319 |
| September 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma |
| Kimberly E West |
| Ronald A White |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 RESPONSE to Motion (Re: #7 MOTION to Dismiss ) Titled as a Rule 60 B Fraud, Motion to file objection to findings by James Willis Commander.(acg, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 8 BRIEF in Support of Motion (Re: #7 MOTION to Dismiss Time-Barred Petition, or in the Alternative, MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to Exhaust Necessary State Remedies) by Luke Pettigrew (With attachments)(Pittman, Julie) Modified on 10/23/2020 to edit link (dma, Deputy Clerk). |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss as Time-Barred Petition, or in the Alternative, MOTION for Failure to Exhaust Necessary State Remedies by Luke Pettigrew Responses due by 10/29/2020(Pittman, Julie). Added MOTION to Dismiss on 10/23/2020 (dma, Deputy Clerk). |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Julie Pittman on behalf of Luke Pettigrew (Pittman, Julie) |
Filing 5
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kimberly E. West, directing Respondent to show cause why the writ should not issue and file a response to the petition. (Re: #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254 ) (acg, Deputy Clerk)
|
| FILING FEES Paid in Full on 9/17/2020 in the amount of $5, receipt number 18427 (Re: #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254 ) by James Willis Commander (jcb, Deputy Clerk) |
|
Filing 4
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kimberly E. West : Substituting Luke Pettigrew, Warden, as the respondent in this case. Petitioner currently is incarcerated at Joseph Harp Correctional Center in Lexington, Oklahoma, and Luke Pettigrew is the warden of that facility. See Rule 2(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases; Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of Ky., 410 U.S. 484, 494-95 (1973). The case name is hereby changed to James W. Commander, Petitioner, v. Luke Pettigrew, Warden, Respondent.(acg, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 3
MINUTE ORDER by District Judge Ronald A. White, referring case to Magistrate Judge Kimberly E. West for all further proceedings in accordance with jurisdiction pursuant to 28 USC 636. All future filings shall bear the case number CIV-20-319-RAW-KEW. (Re: #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254 ) (acg, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 2
MINUTE ORDER by District Judge Ronald A. White: Upon review of the file in this case, the Court finds that the petitioner has not submitted a proper motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis or paid the $5.00 filing fee. The petitioner is directed to submit a properly executed motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, with original signature and have the Trust Fund Officer at his/her facility complete (with an original signature) the Required Certification of Statement of Institutional Accounts and provide a current 6-month financial accounting statement and return the completed motion to the Office of the Clerk or pay the filing fee of $5.00 within 20 days or by 10/5/20. The Clerk is directed to provide the petitioner with a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis form and an instruction sheet.(acg, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254 by James Willis Commander (acg, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
