Commander v. Pettigrew
James Willis Commander |
United States of America and Luke Pettigrew |
6:2020cv00319 |
September 14, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma |
Kimberly E West |
Ronald A White |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. § 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 RESPONSE to Motion (Re: #7 MOTION to Dismiss ) Titled as a Rule 60 B Fraud, Motion to file objection to findings by James Willis Commander.(acg, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 8 BRIEF in Support of Motion (Re: #7 MOTION to Dismiss Time-Barred Petition, or in the Alternative, MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to Exhaust Necessary State Remedies) by Luke Pettigrew (With attachments)(Pittman, Julie) Modified on 10/23/2020 to edit link (dma, Deputy Clerk). |
Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss as Time-Barred Petition, or in the Alternative, MOTION for Failure to Exhaust Necessary State Remedies by Luke Pettigrew Responses due by 10/29/2020(Pittman, Julie). Added MOTION to Dismiss on 10/23/2020 (dma, Deputy Clerk). |
Filing 6 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Julie Pittman on behalf of Luke Pettigrew (Pittman, Julie) |
|
FILING FEES Paid in Full on 9/17/2020 in the amount of $5, receipt number 18427 (Re: #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254 ) by James Willis Commander (jcb, Deputy Clerk) |
|
|
|
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254 by James Willis Commander (acg, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.