Sanford v. Benzon
| Joseph Wayne Sanford |
| Larry Benzon |
| Correction Section (FYI) and Prisoner Litigation Unit |
| 6:2020cv00376 |
| October 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma |
| Kimberly E West |
| Ronald A White |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
MAIL to Joseph Sanford Returned - marked not here. (Re: 8 Minute Order, Striking/Withdrawing Document(s) ) (acg, Deputy Clerk) (Main Document 9 replaced on 11/16/2020) (acg, Deputy Clerk).
|
|
Filing 8
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kimberly E. West, Striking document (Re: 5 Minute Order) filing fee was paid 6/24/19.(acg, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 7
MAIL to Joseph Sanford Returned - marked Not here. (Re: 6 Minute Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge, 5 Minute Order) (acg, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 6
MINUTE ORDER by District Judge Ronald A. White, referring case to Magistrate Judge Kimberly E. West for all further proceedings in accordance with jurisdiction pursuant to 28 USC 636. All future filings shall bear the case number CIV-20-376-RAW-KEW. (acg, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 5
MINUTE ORDER by District Judge Ronald A. White: Upon review of the file in this case, the Court finds that the petitioner has not submitted a proper motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis or paid the $5.00 filing fee. The petitioner is directed to submit a properly executed motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, with original signature and have the Trust Fund Officer at his/her facility complete (with an original signature) the Required Certification of Statement of Institutional Accounts and provide a current 6-month financial accounting statement and return the completed motion to the Office of the Clerk or pay the filing fee of $5.00 within 20 days or by 11/11/20. The Clerk is directed to provide the petitioner with a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis form and an instruction sheet.(acg, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 4
CASE TRANSFERRED IN from the District of Utah
|
|
Filing 3
DOCKET TEXT ORDER - On June 18, 2020, the court ordered Petitioner to show cause within 30 days why this petition should not be transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma. See Dkt. No. 2. That deadline has long passed and Petitioner has failed to respond in any way. In light of Petitioners failure to respond, and for the reasons stated in the show cause order, see Dkt. No. 2 at 12, this petition is hereby transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr., on 10/16/2020. (dz) [Transferred from utd on 10/20/2020.]
|
|
Filing 2
MEMORANDUM DECISION & ORDER: It is hereby ordered that within thirty days Plaintiff must SHOW CAUSE why this petition should not be transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma. Signed by Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr on 06/18/2020. (kpf) [Transferred from utd on 10/20/2020.]
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. 2254 ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 4681086789). (Originally received on 6/24/2019) filed by Joseph Wayne Sanford. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit 1, #2 Envelope 1) Assigned to Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr (nl) [Transferred from utd on 10/20/2020.]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
