Sarioglo v. Wolf et al
| Victor Sarioglo |
| Chad F. Wolf, Marc Moore, William P. Barr and Eddy Rice |
| 6:2020cv00429 |
| November 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma |
| Ronald A White |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT/CERTIFICATE/PROOF/RETURN of Service of Order and Petition for Writ to Willam P. Barr, Attorney General served via certified mail on 12/2/20. (tls, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT/CERTIFICATE/PROOF/RETURN of Service of Order and Petition for Writ to US Immigration and Customs Enforcement - Served via certified mail on 12/1/20(lal, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT/CERTIFICATE/PROOF/RETURN of Service of Order and Petition for Writ to Eddy Rice, Okmulgee County Sheriff - Served via certified mail on 11/30/20(lal, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT/CERTIFICATE/PROOF/RETURN of Service of Order and Petition for Writ to Brian Kuester, US Attorney-OKED - Served via certified mail on 11/27/20(lal, Deputy Clerk) |
| ***Remark: Copies of #5 Order and #2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241 mailed to Attorney General, Eddy Rice, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement - Washington DC and Dallas Office, U.S. Dept of Homeland Security and U.S. Attorney (jcb, Deputy Clerk) |
| FILING FEES Paid in Full on 11/25/2020 in the amount of $5, receipt number AOKEDC-1430494 (Re: #2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241 ) by Victor Sarioglo (Bolourtchi, Raymond) |
Filing 5
ORDER by District Judge Ronald A. White directing the respondents respond to petitioner's 2241 petition and directing the Clerk send copies of the 2241 petition and this order to defendants and the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Oklahoma (lal, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 4 CORRECTED MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk. Upon review of the file in this case, the Court finds that the petitioner has not submitted a proper motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis or paid the $5.00 filing fee. The petitioner is directed to submit a properly executed motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, with original signature and have the Trust Fund Officer at his/her facility complete (with an original signature) the Required Certification (Page 3) and provide a current 6-month financial accounting statement and return the completed motion to the Office of the Clerk or pay the filing fee of $5.00 within 20 days or by 12/14/20. The Clerk is directed to provide the plaintiff with a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis form and an instruction sheet. (Filing Fee due by 12/14/2020)(jcb, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk, directing Plaintiff to pay the filing fee of $400 within 7 days or file a Motion for Informa Pauperis. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this directive will subject this action to immediate dismissal by the Court without prejudice to refiling. NOTE: The court cannot issue summons until the filing fee is paid. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the court's PDF version and email it to CM-ECFIntake_OKED@oked.uscourts.gov. (Filing Fee due by 11/30/2020)(jcb, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241 by Victor Sarioglo (With attachments)(jcb, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Victor Sarioglo (jcb, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
