Levings et al v. Dimont & Associates, LLC et al
Margaret Levings and James Levings |
JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA and Dimont & Associates, LLC |
6:2021cv00021 |
January 25, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma |
Steven P Shreder |
Patrick R Wyrick |
Assault Libel & Slander |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 REPLY to Response to Motion (Re: #10 MOTION to Dismiss Case for Failure to State a Claim ) by Dimont & Associates, LLC ;(Jones, Molly) |
Filing 21 REPLY to Response to Motion (Re: #8 MOTION to Dismiss Case for Failure to State a Claim ) by JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA ;(Rodine, Brent) |
Filing 20 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion (Re: #8 MOTION to Dismiss Case for Failure to State a Claim , #10 MOTION to Dismiss Case for Failure to State a Claim ) by James Levings, Margaret Levings ;(Roloff, Janet) |
Filing 19 ORDER by Judge Patrick R. Wyrick granting #18 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Motion. Responses due by 2/26/2021 (Re: #8 MOTION to Dismiss Case for Failure to State a Claim, #10 MOTION to Dismiss Case for Failure to State a Claim) (kch, Deputy Clerk) (Main Document 19 replaced on 2/16/2021) (kch, Deputy Clerk). |
Filing 18 James Levings, Margaret Levings MOTION to Enlarge Time to Respond to Motion (Re: #8 MOTION to Dismiss Case for Failure to State a Claim , #10 MOTION to Dismiss Case for Failure to State a Claim ) (kch, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 17 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Molly M. Jones on behalf of Dimont & Associates, LLC (Jones, Molly) |
Filing 16 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Andrew M. Gould on behalf of Dimont & Associates, LLC (Gould, Andrew) |
Filing 15 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk: Pursuant to receipt of an election of the District Judge Option and in accordance with LCvR 40.1(c), this case is reassigned to District Judge Patrick R. Wyrick, of the Western District of Oklahoma, serving in this case by designation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 292(b). Magistrate Judge Steven P. Shreder no longer assigned to case. All documents filed in this case in the future shall reflect the new case number CIV-21-21-PRW. (pmb, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 14 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Steven P. Shreder granting #12 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of attorney Molly M. Jones for Dimont & Associates, LLC, provided that local counsel is present at all proceedings, unless otherwise ordered by the Court. This is conditioned on the filing of an entry of appearance and registration for electronic case filing by the applicant within seven (7) days from entry of this Order. See LCvR 83.4 and CM/ECF Administrative Guide of Policies and Procedures. (pmb, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 13 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Steven P. Shreder granting #11 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of attorney Andrew M. Gould for Dimont & Associates, LLC, provided that local counsel is present at all proceedings, unless otherwise ordered by the Court. This is conditioned on the filing of an entry of appearance and registration for electronic case filing by the applicant within seven (7) days from entry of this Order. See LCvR 83.4 and CM/ECF Administrative Guide of Policies and Procedures. (pmb, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 12 MOTION for Attorney Molly M. Jones to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $50 filing fee; receipt number AOKEDC-1454969) by Dimont & Associates, LLC (With attachments) Responses due by 2/17/2021(Dean, Ryan) |
Filing 11 MOTION for Attorney Andrew M. Gould to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $50 filing fee; receipt number AOKEDC-1454955) by Dimont & Associates, LLC (With attachments) Responses due by 2/17/2021(Dean, Ryan) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss Case for Failure to State a Claim by Dimont & Associates, LLC (With attachments) Responses due by 2/16/2021(Dean, Ryan) |
Filing 9 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Ryan L. Dean on behalf of Dimont & Associates, LLC (Dean, Ryan) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss Case for Failure to State a Claim by JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA (With attachments) Responses due by 2/16/2021(Rodine, Brent) |
FILING FEES Paid in Full on 1/28/2021 in the amount of $402, receipt number AOKEDC-1452537 (Re: #2 Notice of Removal) by JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA (sms, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT (identifying: Corporate Parent Dimont Acquisition Holdings, LLC for Dimont & Associates, LLC) by Dimont & Associates, LLC (Meek, Justin) |
Filing 6 Consent to Removal (Re: #2 Notice of Removal) by Dimont & Associates, LLC (Meek, Justin) |
Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT (identifying: Corporate Parent JPMorgan Chase & Co. for JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA) by JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA (Rodine, Brent) |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Justin Meek on behalf of Dimont & Associates, LLC (Meek, Justin) |
Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk, Defendant is directed to pay the $402 filing fee within 7 days. Failure to comply with this directive will subject this action to immediate dismissal by the Court without prejudice to refiling. Consent forms provided to filing party. (Filing Fee due by 2/1/2021)(jcb, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Removal from LeFlore County District Court, case number CJ-20-204 by JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA (With attachments)(jcb, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA (jcb, Deputy Clerk) |
PETITION/COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed in State Court against Dimont & Associates, LLC, JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA by Margaret Levings, James Levings (jcb, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.