The Boldt Company v. Polyvision Corporation
Plaintiff: The Boldt Company
Defendant: Polyvision Corporation
Case Number: 6:2021cv00116
Filed: April 14, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: Timothy D DeGiusti
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER by Judge Timothy D. DeGiusti granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Polyvision Corporation answer or response due 7/2/2021 (Bailey, Michael)
June 1, 2021 Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint (Re: #2 Complaint) by The Boldt Company Responses due by 6/15/2021(Hoss, Henry)
May 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER by Judge Timothy D. DeGiusti granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Polyvision Corporation answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint due 6/11/2021 (Bailey, Michael)
May 7, 2021 Filing 8 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint (Re: #2 Complaint) by The Boldt Company Responses due by 5/21/2021(Hoss, Henry)
April 16, 2021 Filing 7 SUMMONS Issued by Court Clerk as to Polyvision Corporation. (kdc, Deputy Clerk)
April 15, 2021 Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT (identifying: Corporate Parent The Boldt Group, Inc. for The Boldt Company) by The Boldt Company (Hoss, Henry)
April 15, 2021 Filing 5 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Henry D. Hoss on behalf of The Boldt Company (Hoss, Henry)
April 15, 2021 Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk: At the direction of the Court, this case is hereby reassigned to District Judge Timothy D. DeGiusti of the Western District of Oklahoma, serving in this case by designation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 292(b). All documents filed in this case in the future shall reflect the new case number CIV-21-116-TDD. (kdc, Deputy Clerk)
April 15, 2021 Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk directing Plaintiff to pay the filing fee of $402 within 7 days or file a Motion for Informa Pauperis. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this directive will subject this action to immediate dismissal by the Court without prejudice to refiling. NOTE: The court cannot issue summons until the filing fee is paid. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the court's PDF version and email it to CM-ECFIntake_OKED@oked.uscourts.gov. (Filing Fee due by 4/22/2021)(kdc, Deputy Clerk)
April 15, 2021 FILING FEES Paid in Full on 4/15/2021 in the amount of $402, receipt number AOKEDC-1484430 (Re: #2 Complaint ) by The Boldt Company (Hoss, Henry)
April 14, 2021 Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Polyvision Corporation by The Boldt Company. (kdc, Deputy Clerk)
April 14, 2021 Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by The Boldt Company. (kdc, Deputy Clerk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: The Boldt Company v. Polyvision Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: The Boldt Company
Represented By: Henry D. Hoss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Polyvision Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?