Dixon v. Hamilton
| Julius Dixon |
| Casey Hamilton |
| 6:2021cv00236 |
| August 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma |
| Kimberly E West |
| Ronald A White |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
RESPONSE to Motion (Re: #6 MOTION to Dismiss ) by Julius Dixon ;(acg, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 7
BRIEF in Support of Motion (Re: #6 MOTION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus as Untimely) by Casey Hamilton (With attachments)(Hunt, Caroline)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus as Untimely by Casey Hamilton Responses due by 10/5/2021(Hunt, Caroline)
|
|
Filing 5
ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Caroline E.J. Hunt on behalf of Casey Hamilton (Hunt, Caroline)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kimberly E. West, directing Respondent to show cause why the writ should not issue and file a response to the petition. Responses due by 9/22/2021. (Re: #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254 ) (acg, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
FILING FEES Paid in Full on 8/23/2021 in the amount of $5, receipt number 19420 (Re: #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254 ) (tjm, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 3
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kimberly E. West: Upon review of the file in this case, the Court finds that the petitioner has not submitted a proper motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis or paid the $5.00 filing fee. The petitioner is directed to submit a properly executed motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, with original signature and have the Trust Fund Officer at his/her facility complete (with an original signature) the Required Certification of Statement of Institutional Accounts and provide a current 6-month financial accounting statement and return the completed motion to the Office of the Clerk or pay the filing fee of $5.00 within 20 days or by 9/2/21. The Clerk is directed to provide the petitioner with a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis form and an instruction sheet.(acg, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 2
MINUTE ORDER by District Judge Ronald A. White, referring case to Magistrate Judge Kimberly E. West for all further proceedings in accordance with jurisdiction pursuant to 28 USC 636. All future filings shall bear the case number CIV-21-236-RAW-KEW. (acg, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254 by Julius Dixon (acg, Deputy Clerk)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dixon v. Hamilton | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Julius Dixon | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Casey Hamilton | |
| Represented By: | Caroline E.J. Hunt |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
