Allahham v. Moore et al
Petitioner: Arafat Allahham
Respondent: Eddy Rice, Marc Moore, Alejandro Mayorkas and Merrick B. Garland
Case Number: 6:2021cv00334
Filed: November 10, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma
Office: Muskogee Office
Presiding Judge: Ronald A White
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 5, 2022 ***Remark: copy of #1 Petitioner's 2241 Petition and #7 Order mailed to the Warden of the Moore Detention Center and the US Attorney. (jls, Deputy Clerk)
January 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER by District Judge Ronald A. White: In light of the Order entered this date (Re: #7 Order), Petitioner's #6 Motion for Order to Show Cause is hereby deemed MOOT. (tls, Deputy Clerk)
January 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER by District Judge Ronald A. White directing Respondents to file a Response to #1 Petitioner's 2241 Petition and directing the Clerk send a copy of Petitioner's 2241 Petition and this Order to the Respondent, the Warden of the Moore Detention Center, Okmulgee County, Oklahoma and to the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Oklahoma. (tls, Deputy Clerk)
December 30, 2021 Filing 6 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE and MOTION for Order to Show Cause by Arafat Allahham (With attachments)(Bray, John) Modified on 1/4/2022 to edit event (dma, Deputy Clerk).
November 10, 2021 Filing 5 CASE TRANSFERRED IN from the Texas Northern
November 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER ACCEPTING #3 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The Court therefore TRANSFERS this habeas action to the Eastern District of Oklahoma. (Ordered by Judge Ada Brown on 11/9/2021) (ykp) [Transferred from txnd on 11/10/2021.]
October 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The Court should sua sponte transfer this habeas action to the Eastern District of Oklahoma. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 10/15/2021) (oyh) [Transferred from txnd on 11/10/2021.]
October 13, 2021 Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Horan (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter or electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (ygl) [Transferred from txnd on 11/10/2021.]
October 13, 2021 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Arafat Allahham. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. (Filing fee $5; receipt number 0539-12295631) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet JS44 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit(s) Appendix of Exhibits, #3 Proposed Order Order to Show Cause) (Bray, John) (Attachment 1 replaced with flattened PDF on 10/13/2021) (ygl). [Transferred from txnd on 11/10/2021.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Allahham v. Moore et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Arafat Allahham
Represented By: John Michael Bray
Represented By: John M. Bray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Eddy Rice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Marc Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Alejandro Mayorkas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Merrick B. Garland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?