Lawton v. Nunn
| Theodoric B. Lawton |
| Scott Crow, John O'Connell and Scott Nunn |
| 6:2022cv00086 |
| March 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma |
| John F Heil |
| Kimberly E West |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kimberly E. West : Construing Petitioner's "CvR 7.1(g) Motion" #9 as a response to Respondent's motion to dismiss petition for writ of habeas corpus #7 . (Re: #9 MOTION ) (acg, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 9
***RESPONSE to Motion (Re: #7 MOTION to Dismiss)*** MOTION by Theodoric B. Lawton (acg, Deputy Clerk) Modified on 5/5/2022 to term motion and construing document as a Response to Motion per Minute Order 10 (dma, Deputy Clerk).
|
|
Filing 8
BRIEF in Support of Motion (Re: #7 MOTION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus as Time-Barred or in the Alternative, for Failure to Exhaust Necessary State Remedies) by Scott Nunn (With attachments)(Miller, Keeley)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus as Time-Barred or in the Alternative, for Failure to Exhaust Necessary State Remedies by Scott Nunn Responses due by 5/3/2022(Miller, Keeley)
|
|
Filing 6
ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Keeley L. Miller on behalf of Scott Nunn (Miller, Keeley)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kimberly E. West, directing Respondent to show cause why the writ should not issue and file a response to the petition( Responses due by 4/25/2022) (Re: #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254 ) (acg, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
FILING FEES Paid in Full on 3/24/2022 in the amount of $5, receipt number 20030 (Re: #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254 ) by Theodoric B. Lawton (tjm, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 4
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kimberly E. West: Upon review of the file in this case, the Court finds that the petitioner has not submitted a proper motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis or paid the $5.00 filing fee. The petitioner is directed to submit a properly executed motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, with original signature and have the Trust Fund Officer at his/her facility complete (with an original signature) the Required Certification (Page 3) the completed motion to the Office of the Clerk or pay the filing fee of $5.00 within 20 days or by 4/11/22. The Clerk is directed to provide the plaintiff with a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis form and an instruction sheet (acg, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 3
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kimberly E. West: Terminating Scott Crow and John O'Connor as respondents in this action. Petitioner is incarcerated at James Crabtree Correctional Center, and the warden of that facility is the proper respondent in this case. See Rule 2(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases; Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of Ky., 410 U.S. 484, 494-95 (1973). The case name is hereby changed to Theodoric B. Lawton, Petitioner, v. Scott Nunn, Warden, Respondent(acg, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 2
MINUTE ORDER by District Judge John F. Heil, III, referring case to Magistrate Judge Kimberly E. West for all further proceedings in accordance with jurisdiction pursuant to 28 USC 636. All future filings shall bear the case number CIV-22-86-JFH-KEW. (acg, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254 by Theodoric B. Lawton (acg, Deputy Clerk)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
