Gaines v. Brown et al
| Andrew Jordan Gaines and Omar Talib Shakur |
| Kevin Brown, Julia Doorman, Jerome Fergerson and FNU Perez |
| 6:2022cv00205 |
| July 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma |
| Muskogee Office |
| Jason A Robertson |
| Ronald A White |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 JUDGMENT by Court Clerk: This case is dismissed without prejudice. (terminates case) (acg, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER by District Judge Ronald A. White Dismissing action without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to submit a proper motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis or to pay the filing and administrative fee for this case, as directed by the Court on July 18, 2022 8 . (acg, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 8
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jason A. Robertson: Upon review of the file in this case, the Court finds that the plaintiff has not submitted a proper motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis or paid the $350.00 filing fee and the $52.00 administrative fee. The plaintiff is directed to submit a properly executed motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, with original signature and have the Trust Fund Officer at his facility complete (with an original signature) the Required Certification of Statement of Institutional Accounts and provide a current 6-month financial accounting statement and return the completed motion to the Office of the Clerk, or pay the filing and administrative fees totaling $402.00 within 20 days or by 08/02/22. If the plaintiff is granted in forma pauperis status, he will not be required to pay the $52.00 administrative fee. Failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal of this action. The Clerk is directed to provide the plaintiff with a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis form and an instruction sheet. (acg, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 7
MINUTE ORDER by District Judge Ronald A. White, referring case to Magistrate Judge Jason A. Robertson for all further proceedings in accordance with jurisdiction pursuant to 28 USC 636. All future filings shall bear the case number CIV-22-205-RAW-JAR. (acg, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 6 CASE TRANSFERRED IN from the Oklahoma Western |
|
Filing 5
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ~ The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation #4 and TRANSFERS this case to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma. Signed by Judge Bernard M. Jones on 7/18/20222. (dwl) [Transferred from okwd on 7/18/2022.]
|
| Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The undersigned recommends the TRANSFER of this action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma. Objections to R&R due by 6/28/2022. This Report and Recommendation terminates the referral of this matter to the undersigned. Signed by Magistrate Judge Amanda Maxfield Green on 6/7/2022. (rb) [Transferred from okwd on 7/18/2022.] |
| Filing 3 ENTER ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Amanda Maxfield Green. Entered at the direction of Judge Bernard M. Jones on 06/01/2022. (km) [Transferred from okwd on 7/18/2022.] |
| Filing 2 NO PREVIOUS Cases. (km) [Transferred from okwd on 7/18/2022.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kevin Brown, Julia Doorman, Jerome Fergerson, FNU Perez filed by Andrew Jordan Gaines. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(km) [Transferred from okwd on 7/18/2022.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
