Rigsby v. Burkhulter et al
| Dennis Ray Rigsby, Jr |
| Burkhulter, Brewer, Core Civic, Inc., The Oklahoma Bar Association and United States Department of Justice |
| 6:2022cv00287 |
| October 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma |
| Jason A Robertson |
| Ronald A White |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
NOTICE to the court titled as "motion to inform the courts". by Dennis Ray Rigsby, Jr (acg, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 15
MOTION for Leave to Appeal in Forma Pauperis (Re: #8 Notice of Appeal - Interlocutory ) by Dennis Ray Rigsby, Jr Responses due by 12/14/2022(acg, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 14
JUDGMENT by District Judge Ronald A. White: Dismissing action without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to pay the entire filing and administrative fees as directed by the Court on October 24, 2022 #6 . (terminates case) (acg, Deputy Clerk) (acg, Deputy Clerk).
|
|
Filing 13
MINUTE ORDER by District Judge Ronald A. White: Denying Plaintiff's motion to bring issue to the attention of the Court #12 . The Court considered Plaintiff's medical claims in its' Opinion and Order Denying Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #6 . (acg, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 12
MOTION to bring issue to the attention of the Court by Dennis Ray Rigsby, Jr Responses due by 12/2/2022(acg, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER from Circuit Court directing Appellant to show cause in writing on or before November 29, 2022 why he should not be required to prepay the entire filing fee as 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) requires. (Re: #8 Notice of Appeal - Interlocutory) (adw, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 10
APPEAL NUMBER INFORMATION from Circuit Court assigning Case Number 22-7058. (Re: #8 Notice of Appeal - Interlocutory) (adw, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 9
Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Docket Sheet to U.S. Court of Appeals. Pro Se Appeal Packet mailed to Petitioner. (Re: #8 Notice of Appeal - Interlocutory) (With attachments)(adw, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE OF APPEAL to Circuit Court (Interlocutory) (Re: #6 Ruling on Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis ) by Dennis Ray Rigsby, Jr (acg, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 7
OBJECTION (Re: #6 Ruling on Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis ) by Dennis Ray Rigsby, Jr (acg, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 6
OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Ronald A. White denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, full Filing Fee and administrative fees due by 11/14/2022 (acg, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION to submit letter sent to the department of justice (attached) by Dennis Ray Rigsby, Jr Responses due by 11/3/2022(acg, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION to Amend (Re: #1 Complaint ) titled as "motion to submit new information". by Dennis Ray Rigsby, Jr Responses due by 11/3/2022(acg, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 3
MINUTE ORDER by District Judge Ronald A. White, referring case to Magistrate Judge Jason A. Robertson for all further proceedings in accordance with jurisdiction pursuant to 28 USC 636. All future filings shall bear the case number 22-cv-287-RAW-JAR. (acg, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by Dennis Ray Rigsby, Jr Responses due by 10/21/2022(acg, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Dennis Ray Rigsby, Jr (acg, Deputy Clerk)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
