Hill v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Julia C Hill and Julia C. Hill |
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company |
6:2022cv00355 |
December 9, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma |
Kimberly E West |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ANSWER with Jury Demand to Complaint (Re: #2 Complaint) by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company [NOTE: Attorney Raymond Trey Purdom added to party State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company(pty:dft)]. (Purdom, Raymond) |
Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kimberly E. West: Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company's Unopposed Application for Extension to Answer and/or Otherwise Plead (Docket Entry #10 ) is hereby GRANTED. The Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint no later than JANUARY 25, 2023. (Re: #10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer and/or Otherwise Plead) (tjm, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer and/or Otherwise Plead (Re: #2 Complaint) by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company [NOTE: Attorney John S. Gladd added to party State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company(pty:dft)]. Responses due by 1/12/2023(Gladd, John) |
Filing 9 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Robin D. McGrew on behalf of All Plaintiffs (McGrew, Robin) |
Filing 8 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Kristen Merritt on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Merritt, Kristen) |
Filing 7 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Matthew M. McGrew on behalf of All Plaintiffs (McGrew, Matthew) |
Filing 6 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Michael D. McGrew on behalf of All Plaintiffs (McGrew, Michael) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued by Court Clerk as to State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (eaw, Deputy Clerk). |
Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk. Applicable parties are directed to file Disclosure Statements per FRCvP 7.1 within seven (7) days of this order, if they have not already done so. The parties shall use the form entitled Disclosure Statement available on the Court's website (please do not refile if already filed on non-court form unless directed to do so). If you have already filed your Disclosure Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Disclosure Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires. (eaw, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk directing Plaintiff to pay the filing fee of $402 within 7 days or file a Motion for In forma Pauperis. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this directive will subject this action to immediate dismissal by the Court without prejudice to refiling. NOTE: The court cannot issue summons until the filing fee is paid. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the court's PDF version and email it to CM-ECFIntake_OKED@oked.uscourts.gov. Consent forms provided to filing party. (Filing Fee due by 12/16/2022) (Re: #2 Complaint ) (eaw, Deputy Clerk). |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company by Julia C. Hill (eaw, Deputy Clerk). |
Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Julia C. Hill (eaw, Deputy Clerk). |
FILING FEES Paid in Full on 12/9/2022 in the amount of $402, receipt number AOKEDC-1735215 (Re: #2 Complaint ) by Julia C. Hill (McGrew, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.