Jackson v. Social Security Administration
| Michelle Rosemary Jackson |
| Social Security Administration |
| 6:2022cv00365 |
| December 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma |
| Jason A Robertson |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ADMINISTRATIVE TRANSCRIPT (Re: #2 Social Security Complaint ) by Social Security Administration. (With attachments) (O'Malley, Michael)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE by Court Clerk of Consent by the Parties to Proceed Before the United States Magistrate. In accordance with 28 U.S.C., Section 636(c), the Magistrate Judge will exercise complete jurisdiction over all matters in this case including trial. (With attachments)(acg, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 6
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jason A. Robertson. The parties are advised that this case has been assigned to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. In accordance with 28 U.S.C., Section 636(c), the Magistrate Judge will exercise complete jurisdiction over all matters in this case including trial should all parties consent to jurisdiction. Consent or election of a District Judge Option may be exercised by completing the Notice of Consent to Proceed or District Judge Option form on this Court's website at # https://www.oked.uscourts.gov/sites/oked/files/forms/Mag_Consent_final.pdf in accordance with the procedure outlined therein, and shall be completed within fourteen days.(acg, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 5
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jason A. Robertson granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (acg, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by Michelle Rosemary Jackson Responses due by 12/29/2022(Palmer, Lisa)
|
|
Filing 3
MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk directing Plaintiff to pay the filing fee of $402 within 7 days or file a Motion for Informa Pauperis. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this directive will subject this action to immediate dismissal by the Court without prejudice to refiling. Consent forms provided to filing party. (Filing Fee due by 12/21/2022) (Re: #2 Social Security Complaint) (adw, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 2
SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration by Michelle Rosemary Jackson. (With attachments)(adw, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 1
CIVIL COVER SHEET by Michelle Rosemary Jackson. (adw, Deputy Clerk)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jackson v. Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michelle Rosemary Jackson | |
| Represented By: | Lisa J. McNair Palmer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Social Security Administration | |
| Represented By: | Michael J. O'Malley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
