Steele et al v. Smith
Mike Steele, Jacob Sewell, Aubrey Cole, Jordan Alexander, Lee Xiong, Jeff Hope, Kevin Hand, Mark Hulbutta and Ger Xiong |
Shannon Smith |
6:2023cv00124 |
April 14, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma |
Ronald A White |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 MAIL to Mike Steele Returned - marked Not Deliverable as Addressed. (Re: #3 Judgment, #2 Ruling on Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241/2254),Denying Certificate of Appealability) (With attachments)(jld, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 4 MAIL to Jordan Alexander Returned - marked Not Deliverable as Addressed. (Re: #3 Judgment, #2 Ruling on Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241/2254), Denying Certificate of Appealability) (With attachments)(jld, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 3 JUDGMENT by Court Clerk entering judgment (terminates case) (acg, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 2 OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Ronald A. White: Petitioners' petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 2241 (Dkt. 1) is DENIED, and Petitioners are DENIED a certificate of appealability. (acg, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241 by Jordan Alexander, Aubrey Cole, Kevin Hand, Jeff Hope, Mark Hulbutta, Jacob Sewell, Mike Steele, Ger Xiong, Lee Xiong (acg, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.