Swint v. United States of America et al
| Robert James Swint |
| United States of America, Fort James Corp., Georgia Pacific Corporation and Fort James Corporation |
| 6:2023cv00225 |
| July 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma |
| Ronald A White |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk. Applicable parties are directed to file Disclosure Statements per FRCvP 7.1 within seven (7) days of this order, if they have not already done so. The parties shall use the form entitled Disclosure Statement available on the Court's website (please do not refile if already filed on non-court form unless directed to do so). If you have already filed your Disclosure Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Disclosure Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires. (eaw, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by Robert James Swint Responses due by 7/21/2023. (eaw, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Fort James Corporation, Georgia Pacific Corporation, United States of America by Robert James Swint (With attachments). (eaw, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
