L&N Bridge, LLC v. Energetic Services, LLC et al
| L&N Bridge, LLC |
| Energetic Service, LLC, Austin Powder Company, Terpo Seismographic Services, Inc., Admiral Indemnity Company and Energetic Services, LLC |
| 6:2023cv00287 |
| August 31, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma |
| D Edward Snow |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Austin Powder Company (Fischer, Amy) |
Filing 23
ORDER by Magistrate Judge D. Edward Snow granting #22 Unopposed MOTION to Extend Deadline to Serve Terpo Seismograph Services, Inc. (tjm, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 22 Unopposed MOTION to Extend Deadline to Serve Terpo Seismograph Services, Inc. by L&N Bridge, LLC (With attachments) Responses due by 10/31/2023 (Combs, Christopher) |
| Filing 21 ANSWER to Petition/Complaint filed in State Court (Re: State Court Petition/Complaint ) by Austin Powder Company (Fischer, Amy) |
| Filing 20 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Amy Sherry Fischer on behalf of Austin Powder Company (Fischer, Amy) |
| Filing 19 REPLY to Response to Motion (Re: #7 MOTION to Dismiss ) by Admiral Indemnity Company ; (With attachments)(Lennon, John) |
| Filing 18 RESPONSE to Motion (Re: #7 MOTION to Dismiss ) by L&N Bridge, LLC ;(Combs, Christopher) |
| Filing 17 SUMMONS Issued by Court Clerk as to Terpo Seismographic Services, Inc. (eaw, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 16 ANSWER with Jury Demand to Petition/Complaint filed in State Court (Re: State Court Petition/Complaint ) by Energetic Services, LLC (Lennon, John) |
| Filing 15 SUPPLEMENT (Re: #7 MOTION to Dismiss ) by Admiral Indemnity Company (With attachments)(Lennon, John) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER by Magistrate Judge D. Edward Snow granting #8 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to Supplement its Reurged Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's Response is due by 9/22/2023. (Re: #8 MOTION to Amend, #7 MOTION to Dismiss ) (tjm, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 13 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Robert L. Magrini on behalf of L&N Bridge, LLC (Magrini, Robert) |
| Filing 12 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by L&N Bridge, LLC (Combs, Christopher) |
| Filing 11 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Christopher T. Combs on behalf of L&N Bridge, LLC (Combs, Christopher) |
| Filing 10 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Energetic Services, LLC (Lennon, John) |
| Filing 9 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT (identifying: Corporate Parent W.R. Berkley Corporation for Admiral Indemnity Company ) by Admiral Indemnity Company (Lennon, John) |
| Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to Supplement its Reurged Motion to Dismiss (Re: #7 MOTION to Dismiss) by Admiral Indemnity Company; Responses due by 9/20/2023 (Lennon, John) |
| Filing 7 Reurged MOTION to Dismiss by Admiral Indemnity Company (With attachments) Responses due by 9/19/2023 (Lennon, John) |
| FILING FEES Paid in Full on 9/5/2023 in the amount of $402, receipt number 21465 (Re: #2 Notice of Removal ) by L&N Bridge, LLC. (eaw, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by John C. Lennon on behalf of Admiral Indemnity Company, Energetic Services, LLC (Lennon, John) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk Applicable parties are directed to file Disclosure Statements per FRCvP 7.1 within seven (7) days of this order, if they have not already done so. The parties shall use the form entitled Disclosure Statement available on the Court's website (please do not refile if already filed on non-court form unless directed to do so). If you have already filed your Disclosure Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Disclosure Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires.(jld, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk The parties are advised that this case has been assigned to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. In accordance with 28 U.S.C., Section 636(c), the Magistrate Judge will exercise complete jurisdiction over all matters in this case including trial should all parties consent to jurisdiction. Consent or election of a District Judge Option may be exercised by completing the Consent Form (Civil Case Originally Assigned to Magistrate Judge) on this Court's website at # https://www.oked.uscourts.gov/forms/all-forms/civil in accordance with the procedure outlined therein. If a party does not wish to consent to such jurisdiction, they must complete the Reassignment section. Completed forms should be submitted in PDF format to Consents_OKED@oked.uscourts.gov within twenty-one days.(Miscellaneous Deadline set for 9/21/2023)(jld, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk Defendant is directed to pay the $402 filing fee within 7 days. Failure to comply with this directive will subject this action to immediate dismissal by the Court without prejudice to refiling. Consent forms provided to filing party. (Filing Fee due by 9/7/2023) (Re: #2 Notice of Removal ) (jld, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Removal from Bryan County District Court, case number CJ-2023-83 by Admiral Indemnity Company, Energetic Services, LLC (With attachments)(jld, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Admiral Indemnity Company, Energetic Services, LLC (jld, Deputy Clerk) |
| PETITION/COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed in State Court against Admiral Indemnity Company, Austin Powder Company, Energetic Service, LLC, Terpo Seismographic Services, Inc. by L&N Bridge, LLC (jld, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
