Woodard v. State of Oklahoma et al
Joseph Lee Woodward and Joseph Lee Woodard |
State of Oklahoma and Leflore County District Attorneys Office |
6:2023cv00327 |
September 28, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma |
Jason A Robertson |
Ronald A White |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 JUDGMENT by Court Clerk entering judgment (terminates case) (acg, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 4 OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Ronald A. White: Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b) and 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). This dismissal shall count as a "strike" or "prior occasion" under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g).(acg, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER by District Judge Ronald A. White, referring case to Magistrate Judge Jason A. Robertson for all further proceedings in accordance with jurisdiction pursuant to 28 USC 636. All future filings shall bear the case number CIV-23-327-RAW-JAR. (acg, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by Joseph Lee Woodard Responses due by 10/12/2023 (acg, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Joseph Lee Woodard (acg, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.