Weinert v. State of Oklahoma et al
Steven Alexander Weinert |
State of Oklahoma, Attorney General, Pushmataha County Sheriff's Department and B.J. Hedgecock |
6:2023cv00330 |
September 28, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma |
Jason A Robertson |
Ronald A White |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 MOTION for order to remove to proper jurisdiction election for shock incarceration program by Steven Alexander Weinert Responses due by 12/5/2023(acg, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 10 ORDER by District Judge Ronald A. White: Granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, Initial Filing Fee due by 12/11/2023 in the amount of $10.00 (acg, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 9 ACCOUNT STATEMENT of Prisoner Trust Fund by Steven Alexander Weinert (acg, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 8 LETTER from Plaintiff to Clerk re: filing fee along with grievances by Steven Alexander Weinert (acg, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 7 LETTER from Plaintiff to Clerk, Eastern District of Oklahoma by Steven Alexander Weinert (acg, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jason A. Robertson: Directing plaintiff to submit within fourteen (14) days a Statement of Institutional Accounts form, completed by the appropriate jail official. Failure to submit a proper Statement of Institutional Accounts as directed will result in dismissal of this action. The Court Clerk is directed to send plaintiff and the trust fund officer at his facility copies of this minute order and of the court's Statement of Institutional Accounts form. (SPS) (acg, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of civil and criminal complaint (Re: #1 Complaint ) by Steven Alexander Weinert (acg, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by Steven Alexander Weinert Responses due by 10/26/2023(acg, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jason A. Robertson: Upon review of the file in this case, the Court finds that the plaintiff has not submitted a proper motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis or paid the $350.00 filing fee and the $52.00 administrative fee. The plaintiff is directed to submit a properly executed motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, with original signature and have the Trust Fund Officer at his facility complete (with an original signature) the Required Certification of Statement of Institutional Accounts and provide a current 6-month financial accounting statement and return the completed motion to the Office of the Clerk, or pay the filing and administrative fees totaling $402.00 within 20 days or by 10/18/23. If the plaintiff is granted in forma pauperis status, he will not be required to pay the $52.00 administrative fee. Failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal of this action. The Clerk is directed to provide the plaintiff with a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis form and an instruction sheet. (rak, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 2 MINUTE ORDER by District Judge Ronald A. White, referring case to Magistrate Judge Jason A. Robertson for all further proceedings in accordance with jurisdiction pursuant to 28 USC 636. All future filings shall bear the case number CIV-23-330-RAW-JAR. (rak, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Steven Alexander Weinert. (With attachments)(rak, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.