Parker v. Southcrest Hospital
Plaintiff: Estella Parker
Defendant: Southcrest Hospital
Case Number: 4:2008cv00631
Filed: October 24, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Office: Civil Rights: Other Office
County: Tulsa
Presiding Judge: Paul J Cleary
Presiding Judge: Gregory K Frizzell
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:2000 Job Discrimination (Race)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 28, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 38 OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Paul J Cleary ; granting 35 Motion to Quash; granting 36 Motion to Quash; granting 37 Motion for Protective Order (PJC1, Chambers)
May 13, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 24 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Gregory K Frizzell ; denying 17 Motion to Dismiss (hbo, Dpty Clk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Parker v. Southcrest Hospital
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Estella Parker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Southcrest Hospital
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?