Ciempa v. Jones et al
David Ciempa |
Justin Jones, Walter Dinwiddle, Debbie L Morton, Al Blair, Dick Bartley, Kameron Harvanek, G McCleary, Curtis Hood, James Cave, Rick Boyett, Unknown Employee and Chris Redeagle |
4:2008cv00685 |
November 20, 2008 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
Muskogee |
Claire V Eagan |
T Lane Wilson |
None |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 138 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan that Defendants' Plan to Accommodate Plaintiff's Request for NGE Chapel Time (Dkt. # 121) is approved. Defendants shall comply with the terms of the Plan to accommodate NGE chapel time. ; finding as moot 128 Motion to Stay; denying 131 Motion to Supplement; denying 132 Motion to Supplement (Re: 121 Notice (Other), Notice (Other), Notice (Other), Notice (Other) ) (RGG, Chambers) |
Filing 105 OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Claire V Eagan that Defendants' second motion for summary judgment (Dkt. # 90) is granted in part and denied in part as follows: Defendant McClary's motion for summary judgment is granted as to Plain tiff's claim based on the book Stoic Warriors and Defendant McClary is terminated as a party; Defendants Jones and Brown are not entitled to summary judgment on Plaintiff's request for NGE group time in the chapel and their motion for summa ry judgment is denied. Within sixty (60) days of the entry of this Opinion and Order, Defendants Brown and Jones shall submit in writing either a plan accommodating Plaintiff's request for space and time in the prison chapel for the religious e xercise of his NGE beliefs using the least restrictive means to advance their compelling government interest, or a demonstration that there are no less restrictive means, other than a total ban, to ensure institutional security. Plaintiff may file a response to Defendants' submission within thirty (30) days of its filing. ; setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): ( Miscellaneous Deadline set for 11/10/2011); granting in part and denying in part 90 Motion for Summary Judgment; grant ing 100 Motion to Supplement; denying 103 Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Re: 60 Opinion and Order, Adding/Terminating Party(ies),, Setting/Resetting Deadline(s)/Hearing(s), Ruling on Motion to Dismiss, Ruling on Motion for Summary Judgment, Ruling on Motion to Reconsider, Ruling on Motion to Supplement,,,, Adding/Terminating Party(ies),, Setting/Resetting Deadline(s)/Hearing(s),,,,,,,, Adding/Terminating Party(ies),, Setting/Resetting Deadline(s)/Hearing(s),,,,,,,, Adding/Terminating P arty(ies),, Setting/Resetting Deadline(s)/Hearing(s),,,,,,,, Adding/Terminating Party(ies),, Setting/Resetting Deadline(s)/Hearing(s),,,,,,,, Adding/Terminating Party(ies),, Setting/Resetting Deadline(s)/Hearing(s),,,,,, 18 Amended Complaint ) (RGG, Chambers) |
Filing 84 OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Claire V Eagan that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Depose Non-Parties by Written Questions (Dkt. # 83) is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff may take depositions of Hood and Bartley by means of written questions, but Hood and Bartley are not required to respond to questions concerning the seizure of the U.S. Army Ranger's Handbook or The Soldier's Guide. Plaintiff shall serve notice for the depositions of Hood and Bartley and copies of the written questions on defendants no later than January 18, 2010. Defendants shall designate a prison official or ODOC employee to serve as an officer to administer the deposition. Defendants shall serve cross-questions as required by Rule 31(a)(5) within five (5) days of receiving notice of the deposition. ; granting in part and denying in part 83 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief (RGG, Chambers) |
Filing 60 OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Claire V Eagan that summary judgment is entered for defendants Dinwiddie, Morton, Blair, Bartley, Harvanek, Hood, Cave, Boyett, and Redeagle, and they are terminated as parties. Summary judgment is entered on the claims against McClary, Jones, and Brown insofar as those defendants were sued in their individual capacities. Additional motions for summary judgment may be filed after a reasonable time for additional discovery, but no later than October 31, 2010. ; terminating party Rick Boyett; James Cave; Walter Dinwiddle; John Doe; Kameron Harvanek; Curtis Hood; Debbie L Morton; Chris Redeagle; Dick Bartley and Al Blair ; setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): ( Miscellaneous Deadline set for 10/31 /2010); granting in part and denying in part 42 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 42 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 53 Motion to Reconsider; granting 56 Motion to Supplement; granting 57 Motion to Supplement; granting 58 Motion to Supplement (Re: 18 Amended Complaint ) (RGG, Chambers) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.