Mock v. Principal Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff: McKel E Mock
Defendant: Principal Life Insurance Company
Case Number: 4:2008cv00769
Filed: December 29, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Office: Labor: E.R.I.S.A. Office
County: Creek
Presiding Judge: Paul J Cleary
Presiding Judge: James H Payne
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 29:1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 57 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge James H Payne (pll, Dpty Clk)
March 18, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 40 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge James H Payne ; denying 26 Motion for Discovery (Re: 30 Objection ) (pll, Dpty Clk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mock v. Principal Life Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: McKel E Mock
Represented By: Sean E Manning
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Principal Life Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?