Garner v. Equilon Pipeline Company, LLC
Plaintiff: George R Garner
Defendant: Equilon Pipeline Company, LLC
Case Number: 4:2008cv00777
Filed: December 31, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Office: Contract: Other Office
County: Creek
Presiding Judge: Frank H McCarthy
Presiding Judge: Claire V Eagan
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 12, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 17 OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Claire V Eagan ; remanding case (terminates case) ; granting 14 Motion to Remand (Re: 2 Notice of Removal, State Court Petition/Complaint ) (RGG, Chambers)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Garner v. Equilon Pipeline Company, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: George R Garner
Represented By: George Michael Miles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Equilon Pipeline Company, LLC
Represented By: Daniel J Hoehner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?