Ceballos v. Tulsa Drug Enforcement Agency

Justia Dockets & Filings Tenth Circuit Oklahoma Northern District Ceballos v. Tulsa Drug Enforcement Agency

Ceballos v. Tulsa Drug Enforcement Agency

Plaintiff:	George Ceballos
Defendant:	Tulsa Drug Enforcement Agency
Case Number:	4:2009cv00075
Filed:	February 17, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Office:	Civil Rights: Other Office
County:	Tulsa
Presiding Judge:	Claire V Eagan
Presiding Judge:	T Lane Wilson
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	28:1983 Civil Rights

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 19, 2009	Filing 3 OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Claire V Eagan - Plaintiff is required to pay the filing fee no later than March 11, 2009, or his case will be dismissed without prejudice on this basis. Plaintiff's claim against defendant Tulsa Drug Enforce ment Agency is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6). If plaintiff believes that he can file an amended complaint that fully complies with the requirements set forth in this Opinion and Order, he may file an am ended complaint no later than March 11, 2009. Plaintiff is advised that he must pay the filing fee and an amended complaint fully complying with this Opinion and Order by March 11, 2009, or this case will be dismissed. ; setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): ( Filing Fee due by 3/11/2009); denying 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Re: 1 Complaint ) (RGG, Chambers)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 19, 2009

Filing 3 OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Claire V Eagan - Plaintiff is required to pay the filing fee no later than March 11, 2009, or his case will be dismissed without prejudice on this basis. Plaintiff's claim against defendant Tulsa Drug Enforce ment Agency is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6). If plaintiff believes that he can file an amended complaint that fully complies with the requirements set forth in this Opinion and Order, he may file an am ended complaint no later than March 11, 2009. Plaintiff is advised that he must pay the filing fee and an amended complaint fully complying with this Opinion and Order by March 11, 2009, or this case will be dismissed. ; setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): ( Filing Fee due by 3/11/2009); denying 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Re: 1 Complaint ) (RGG, Chambers)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ceballos v. Tulsa Drug Enforcement Agency
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: George Ceballos
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Tulsa Drug Enforcement Agency
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?