Crowe & Dunlevy, P.C. v. Stidham
Plaintiff: Crowe & Dunlevy, P.C.
Defendant: Gregory R Stidham
Case Number: 4:2009cv00095
Filed: February 24, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Office: Other Statutory Actions Office
County: Tulsa
Presiding Judge: Paul J Cleary
Presiding Judge: Terence Kern
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1331 Fed. Question

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 24, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 30 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Terence Kern ; directing parties to file joint status report( Status Report due by 5/8/2009); granting 11 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; finding as moot 13 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order; denying 17 Motion to Dismiss (vah, Chambers)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Crowe & Dunlevy, P.C. v. Stidham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Crowe & Dunlevy, P.C.
Represented By: James L Kincaid
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gregory R Stidham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?