CTI Services, L.L.C. v. Haremza et al
CTI Services, L.L.C. and Roger Walker |
Ken Haremza, T.D. Williamson, Inc. and Energy Maintenance Services Group I. L.L.C. |
4:2009cv00144 |
March 13, 2009 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
Copyright Office |
Tulsa |
Gregory K Frizzell |
T Lane Wilson |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
28:1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 382 OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Gregory K Frizzell ; granting 333 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (hbo, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 184 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Gregory K Frizzell ; granting in part and denying in part 50 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (hbo, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 183 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Gregory K Frizzell ; granting 130 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (hbo, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 179 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Gregory K Frizzell ; setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): ( Miscellaneous Deadline set for 6/17/2011); granting 119 Motion to Amend (Re: 105 Amended Complaint, ) (hbo, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 161 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Gregory K Frizzell ; denying 153 Appeal of Magistrate Judge's Order (hbo, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 104 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Gregory K Frizzell ; setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): ( Miscellaneous Deadline set for 3/2/2011); granting 82 Sealed Motion (hbo, Dpty Clk) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.