Crawford v. Horton
Petitioner: Adrian Dwane Crawford
Respondent: Danny Horton
Case Number: 4:2009cv00152
Filed: March 17, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: Payne
Presiding Judge: Paul J Cleary
Presiding Judge: Claire V Eagan
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 25, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 18 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan ; denying certificate of appealability; finding as moot 17 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief; denying 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241/2254) (Re: 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254 ) (RGG, Chambers)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Crawford v. Horton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Adrian Dwane Crawford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Danny Horton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?