Maximum Availability Limited v. Computer Business Solutions, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Tenth Circuit Oklahoma Northern District Maximum Availability Limited v. Computer Business Solutions, Inc.

Maximum Availability Limited v. Computer Business Solutions, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Maximum Availability Limited
Defendant:	Computer Business Solutions, Inc.
Case Number:	4:2009cv00416
Filed:	June 29, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Office:	Tulsa Office
County:	Tulsa
Presiding Judge:	Paul J Cleary
Presiding Judge:	Claire V Eagan
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 8, 2013	Filing 89 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan ; denying 74 Motion for Summary Judgment; accepting 86 Report and Recommendation (Re: 20 Judgment,,,, Entering Default Judgment,, Ruling on Motion for Default Judgment, 67 Stipulation of Dismissal ) (RGG, Chambers)
June 1, 2011	Filing 56 OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Claire V Eagan ; setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): If plaintiff elects to take issue with garnishees amended answer, the matter is referred to the Honorable T. Lane Wilson for evidentiary hearing on July 12, 2011 and for report and recommendation ( Miscellaneous Deadline set for 6/8/2011); denying 45 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 46 Motion to Amend; denying 48 Motion for Summary Judgment (djh, Dpty Clk)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 8, 2013

Filing 89 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan ; denying 74 Motion for Summary Judgment; accepting 86 Report and Recommendation (Re: 20 Judgment,,,, Entering Default Judgment,, Ruling on Motion for Default Judgment, 67 Stipulation of Dismissal ) (RGG, Chambers)

June 1, 2011

Filing 56 OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Claire V Eagan ; setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): If plaintiff elects to take issue with garnishees amended answer, the matter is referred to the Honorable T. Lane Wilson for evidentiary hearing on July 12, 2011 and for report and recommendation ( Miscellaneous Deadline set for 6/8/2011); denying 45 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 46 Motion to Amend; denying 48 Motion for Summary Judgment (djh, Dpty Clk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Maximum Availability Limited v. Computer Business Solutions, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maximum Availability Limited
Represented By:	Paige Nicole Shelton
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Computer Business Solutions, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?