Givens et al v. State of Oklahoma et al
| Maurice Givens and Demika Jones Givens |
| John Doe and Shadow Mountain Behavioral Health System |
| 4:2009cv00430 |
| July 6, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| Tulsa Office |
| Tulsa |
| Claire V Eagan |
| T Lane Wilson |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Claire V Eagan that Defendant Shadow Mountain Behavioral Health System's Motion to Dismiss and Brief in Support (Dkt. # 10) is granted in part and denied in part: it is granted as to the Givenses' fi rst claim for relief as to § 1983 and denied as to the Givenses' third claim for relief as to negligence. The first claim for relief is dismissed with leave to amend. If the Givenses can, consistent with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedu re, allege a policy or custom of Shadow Mountain sufficient to state a claim under § 1983, they may file a second amended complaint within ten days of this order. Defendant must answer the amended petition (Dkt. # 2-4) within ten days of this order. ; setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): ( Status Report due by 11/19/2009); granting in part and denying in part 10 Motion to Dismiss (Re: 2 Notice of Removal ) (RGG, Chambers)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
