Blagg v. Line et al
| Brent Blagg |
| Jerry Line, Davis Charlie Strong, Jr and Brent Alan Radke |
| 4:2009cv00703 |
| October 29, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| Tulsa Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Claire V Eagan |
| Frank H McCarthy |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
276
OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan that this matter will be set for settlement conference in March 2014 ; denying 264 Motion to Reconsider (Re: 260 Order,, Ruling on Motion to Accelerate/Extend/Reset Hearing(s)/Deadline(s), Ruling on Motion for Hearing,,,,,,,, ) (RGG, Chambers)
|
|
Filing
255
OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan that the parties shall submit a limited proposed scheduling order no later than 12/19/13 ; reopening case; granting 248 Motion to Reopen Case (RGG, Chambers) Modified on 12/5/2013 to correct title of event (srt, Dpty Clk).
|
|
Filing
247
OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan ; denying 246 Motion to Reopen Case (Re: 226 Order, Administratively Closing Case, ) (RGG, Chambers)
|
|
Filing
187
OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Claire V Eagan that Defendant Jerry Line's Motion for Summary Judgment and Brief in Support (Dkt. # 127) and Defendants WP Oil and Gas, LLC and Petron Energy, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment with Brief in Support (Dkt. # 132) are denied. Defendant Jerry Line's Amended Motion for Summary Judgment and Brief in Support (Dkt. # 41 in case no. 09-CV-708-CVE-FHM), Defendant Jerry Line's Motion for Summary Judgment and Brief in Support (Dkt. # 35 in case no. 10-CV-502-CVE-FHM), and Defendant WP Oil and Gas, LLC and Petron Energy, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment with Brief in Support (Dkt. # 38 in case no. 11-cv-271-CVE-FHM) are denied. ; denying 127 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 132 Motion for Summary Judgment (Re: 122 Amended Complaint ) (RGG, Chambers)
|
|
Filing
177
OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Claire V Eagan ; setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): denying 58 Motion to Amend in Consolidated Case 09-CV-708-CVE-FHM ( Miscellaneous Deadline set for 2/1/2012); denying 164 Motion for Leave to File Document(s); denying 174 Motion to Clarify; granting in part and denying in part 175 Motion to Amend; denying 176 Motion to Reconsider (Re: 147 Response in Support of Motion, 146 MOTION to Bifurcate Liability and Damages Portions of Tria ls and Brief in Support, 169 Order,,,,,,, 119 Minutes of Scheduling Conference,,, Setting/Resetting Deadline(s)/Hearing(s), Setting/Resetting Deadline(s)/Hearing(s), Setting/Resetting Deadline(s)/Hearing(s),,,, Ruling on Motion for Joinder of Party(s), Ruling on Motion for Joinder of Party(s), Ruling on Motion for Joinder of Party(s), 134 MOTION to Consolidate Cases and Brief in Support, 139 MOTION to Consolidate Cases For Trial, 167 Response in Opposition to Motion, 124 MOTION to Consolidate Cases, 168 Opinion and Order,,,, Consolidating Cases,,,,,,,, Ruling on Motion to Consolidate Cases,,,,,,,,,,,, Ruling on Motion to Bifurcate,,,, Ruling on Joinder in Motion,,, 122 Amended Complaint ) (djh, Dpty Clk)
|
|
Filing
168
OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Claire V Eagan - Consolidating cases 09-CV-0703; 09-CV-0708; 10-CV-0502; and 11-CV-0271; designating 09-CV-0703-CVE-FHM as BASE FILE; ALL ENTRIES TO BE MADE IN BASE FILE ONLY; an Amended Scheduling Order will be en tered setting these consolidated cases for jury trial on the April 2012 jury trial docket ; consolidating cases (trial); granting 124 Motion to Consolidate Cases; granting 134 Motion to Consolidate Cases; granting 139 Motion to Consolidate Cases; denying 146 Motion to Bifurcate; denying 149 Joinder in Motion (Re: 41 Amended Complaint, 113 Opinion and Order,,,, Adding/Terminating Party(ies), Adding/Terminating Party(ies), Ruling on Motion to Dismiss Party,, Ruling on Motion to Accelerate/Extend/Reset Hearing(s)/Deadline(s), Ruling on Motion to Accelerate/Extend/Reset Hearing(s)/Deadline(s), 122 Amended Complaint ) (RGG, Chambers)
|
|
Filing
142
OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Frank H McCarthy ; denying 137 Motion to Accelerate/Extend/Reset Hearing(s)/Deadline(s) (jcm, Dpty Clk)
|
|
Filing
114
OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Frank H McCarthy ; denying 102 Motion to Quash (crp, Dpty Clk)
|
|
Filing
113
OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Claire V Eagan ; terminating party Nagasco Pipeline Logistics, LLC, Blinkco, Inc. and L&L Well Service, LLC ; granting 100 Motion to Dismiss Party; denying 105 Motion to Accelerate/Extend/Reset Hearing(s)/Deadline(s) (Re: 41 Amended Complaint ) (RGG, Chambers)
|
|
Filing
96
OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Claire V Eagan ; striking/withdrawing document(s); granting 77 Motion to Dismiss (Re: 72 Amended Complaint ) (Documents Terminated: 72 Amended Complaint ) (RGG, Chambers)
|
|
Filing
70
OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Frank H McCarthy ; granting 63 Motion to Stay; finding as moot 69 Joinder in Motion (MLC, Chambers)
|
|
Filing
40
OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Claire V Eagan - CASE CONSOLIDATED FOR PRETRIAL DISCOVERY PURPOSES ONLY; designating this case as the Base File for Discovery; directing parties to correct case caption accordingly; an amended scheduling order will be entered; this opinion and order will be filed in consolidated cases also ; consolidating cases (discovery); granting 32 Motion to Consolidate Cases; granting 33 Motion to Accelerate/Extend/Reset Hearing(s)/Deadline(s) (Re: 17 Amended Complaint ) (RGG, Chambers)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
