Cyprus Amax Minerals Company v. TCI Pacific Communications, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Cyprus Amax Minerals Company
Defendant: TCI Pacific Communications, Inc., Viacom, Inc., CBS Corporation and CBS Operations, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2011cv00252
Filed: April 26, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Office: Tulsa Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Paul J Cleary
Presiding Judge: Terence Kern
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 9607
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 355 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan - Defendant's Motion to Amend Findings of Fact pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 52(b) (Dkt. # 337) is denied. The Court Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Opinion and Order to the Tenth Cir cuit Court of Appeals in reference to Appeal No. 21-5038. ; denying 337 Motion to Alter Order/Judgment (Re: 337 MOTION to Alter Order/Judgment /Findings of Fact Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(b), 332 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law,,,,,,,,,,, ) (RGG, Chambers)
March 31, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 332 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW by Judge Claire V Eagan - Judgment will be entered in favor of plaintiff Cyprus Amax Minerals Company and against defendant TCI Pacific Communications, LLC as to Counts III and V of the amended complaint in the amount of $14,265,070.20, plus post-judgment interest thereon from this date at the rate of.07 % per annum, plus the costs of this action. A declaratory judgment will be entered in favor of plaintiff Cyprus Amax Minerals Company dec laring that defendant TCI Pacific Communications, LLC is liable for 45 percent of future response costs, if any, incurred by plaintiff to complete the CSP. Judgment will be entered in favor of TCI Pacific Communications, LLC and against plaintiff Cy prus Amax Minerals Company as to Counts IV and VI of the amended complaint. (Re: 318 Minutes of Nonjury Trial,,, Striking/Terminating Deadline(s)/Hearing(s),,,,, 305 Minutes of Nonjury Trial, 309 Minutes of Nonjury Trial,, Setting/Reset ting Deadline(s)/Hearing(s), 312 Minutes of Nonjury Trial,, Setting/Resetting Deadline(s)/Hearing(s), 315 Minutes of Nonjury Trial,, Setting/Resetting Deadline(s)/Hearing(s), 306 Minutes of Nonjury Trial, 106 Amended Complaint ) (RGG, Chambers)
March 31, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 243 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan that defendant's Motion to Declare the Temporal Scope of the Court's February 2, 2015 Order on Alter Ego Status (Dkt. # 215) is denied. ; denying 215 Motion to Clarify (RGG, Chambers)
February 2, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 183 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan that Plaintiff Cyprus Amax Mineral Company's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Integrated Brief in Support (Dkt. # 151) is granted, and Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and I ntegrated Memorandum in Support (Dkt. # 161) is denied. The parties are directed to file no later than February 13, 2015 a joint status report on the issues remaining for adjudication and a proposed scheduling order. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge T. Lane Wilson for a supplemental settlement conference in light of this Opinion and Order. ; setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): ( Status Report due by 2/13/2015); granting 151 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 161 Motion for Summary Judgment (Re: 2 Complaint ) (RGG, Chambers)
February 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 145 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan ruling on Daubert motions; and directing that the parties' motions for summary judgment on the issue of TFMC's and NJ Zinc's corporate relationship, including any arguments as to piercing the corporate veil, are due no later that April 21, 2014. Response and replies are due pursuant to LCvR 7.2. This matter will be set for a settlement conference before the summary judgment briefing is completed. ; setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): ( Dispositive Motions due by 4/21/2014); denying 124 Motion to Exclude; denying 125 Motion to Exclude; denying 126 Motion to Exclude; granting 127 Motion to Exclude (Re: 106 Amended Complaint ) (RGG, Chambers)
December 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 142 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge John E Dowdell ; terminating party CBS Operations, Inc. ; granting 114 Motion to Dismiss (Re: 106 Amended Complaint ) (SAS, Chambers)
February 21, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 118 OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Paul J Cleary ; finding as moot 100 Motion for Protective Order (kjp, Dpty Clk)
January 22, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 110 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge John E Dowdell ; denying 97 Objection to Magistrate Judge's Order (SAS, Chambers)
October 12, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 93 OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Paul J Cleary ; setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): ( Miscellaneous Deadline set for 10/26/2012); denying 68 Motion to Compel; granting 69 Motion for Protective Order (kjp, Dpty Clk)
September 12, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 89 OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Gregory K Frizzell ; granting 53 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief (hbo, Dpty Clk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cyprus Amax Minerals Company v. TCI Pacific Communications, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cyprus Amax Minerals Company
Represented By: Timothy James Bomhoff
Represented By: Cathleen M Devlin
Represented By: Christina D Riggs
Represented By: Reid Edward Robison
Represented By: John F Stoviak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TCI Pacific Communications, Inc.
Represented By: Mark D Coldiron
Represented By: Seth Dale Coldiron
Represented By: Paula M Jantzen
Represented By: Paul Douglas Steinman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Viacom, Inc.
Represented By: Mark D Coldiron
Represented By: Seth Dale Coldiron
Represented By: Paula M Jantzen
Represented By: Paul Douglas Steinman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CBS Corporation
Represented By: Mark D Coldiron
Represented By: Seth Dale Coldiron
Represented By: Paula M Jantzen
Represented By: Paul Douglas Steinman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CBS Operations, Inc.
Represented By: Mark D Coldiron
Represented By: Seth Dale Coldiron
Represented By: Paula M Jantzen
Represented By: Paul Douglas Steinman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?