Hawkins v. Smith et al
| Dorotha Louise Hawkins |
| Sally Howe Smith and Tulsa County Board of County Commissioners |
| 4:2011cv00372 |
| June 14, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| Tulsa Office |
| Tulsa |
| Gregory K Frizzell |
| T Lane Wilson |
| Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
129
OPINION AND ORDER by Judge John E Dowdell ; striking/terminating deadline(s)/Hearing(s); granting 81 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 86 Motion for Summary Judgment; finding as moot 95 Motion in Limine; finding as moot 96 Motion in Limine; finding as moot 97 Motion in Limine; finding as moot 98 Motion in Limine; finding as moot 99 Motion in Limine; finding as moot 100 Motion in Limine; finding as moot 101 Motion in Limine; finding as moot 128 Motion to Accelerate/Extend/Reset Hearing(s)/Deadline(s) (Re: 52 Amended Complaint ) (SAS, Chambers)
|
|
Filing
37
OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Gregory K Frizzell ; setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): ( Miscellaneous Deadline set for 12/10/2012); granting in part and denying in part 31 Motion to Amend (hbo, Dpty Clk)
|
|
Filing
29
OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Gregory K Frizzell ; granting in part and denying in part 24 Motion to Reconsider (hbo, Dpty Clk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
