Williams v. Tulsa, City of et al
Plaintiff: Demarco Deon Williams
Defendant: Tulsa, City of and Jeffrey Michael Henderson
Case Number: 4:2011cv00469
Filed: July 28, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Office: Tulsa Office
County: Tulsa
Presiding Judge: Terence Kern
Presiding Judge: Frank H McCarthy
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 19, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 177 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW by Judge Terence Kern (vah, Chambers)
December 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 150 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Terence Kern ; granting 143 Motion to Certify (vah, Chambers)
November 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 131 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Terence Kern ; denying 124 Motion for Summary Judgment (vah, Chambers)
June 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 123 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Terence Kern ; terminating party Ron Palmer and Tulsa, City of (a Municipal Corporation, terminated on 1/22/13, re-added 11/13/13) ; granting 99 Motion to Dismiss Party (vah, Chambers)
September 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 60 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Terence Kern ; setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): ( Status Report due by 10/11/2013); denying 56 Motion to Quash (vah, Chambers)
April 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 51 OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Frank H McCarthy , setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): ( Miscellaneous Deadline set for 5/15/2013) (jcm, Dpty Clk)
January 22, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 47 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Terence Kern - all deadlines stricken ; striking/terminating deadline(s)/Hearing(s); striking/withdrawing document(s); granting 33 Motion for Summary Judgment; finding as moot 34 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jur isdiction; granting 8 Motion to Dismiss Party; granting 23 Motion to Strike Document(s); denying 28 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution; denying 29 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief (Re: 21 Amended Complaint ) (Documents Terminated: 21 Amended Complaint ) (vah, Chambers)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. Tulsa, City of et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Demarco Deon Williams
Represented By: Charles Robert Burton, IV
Represented By: Fred Randolph Lynn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tulsa, City of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jeffrey Michael Henderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?