Hopper v. Wyant et al
| Danny D Hopper |
| Steven Venturi, Terrell Crosson, Caroline Weaver, Don Pope & Associates, Eddie Wyant, Traci Cain, Christy Wright, Susa Hopper, James Hankins, Coyle Law Firm and Cimarron Correctional Facility |
| 4:2011cv00545 |
| August 31, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| Tulsa Office |
| Pawnee |
| Terence Kern |
| Frank H McCarthy |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
84
OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Terence Kern ; dismissing/terminating case (terminates case) ; granting 33 Motion to Dismiss; granting 39 Motion to Dismiss; denying 57 Motion to Amend; granting 65 Motion to Dismiss; finding as moot 65 Motion for More Definite Statement; denying 72 Motion to Supplement; granting 74 Motion to Supplement; denying 77 Motion to Accelerate/Extend/Reset Hearing(s)/Deadline(s); denying 77 Motion to Reconsider; denying 78 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief; g ranting 80 Motion to Dismiss; denying 81 Motion to Strike Document(s); denying 82 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief; denying 7 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief; granting 15 Motion to Dismiss Party; granting 16 Motion to Dismiss; granting 20 Motion to Dismiss; denying 22 Motion for More Definite Statement; granting 25 Motion for Summary Judgment (vah, Chambers)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
