Cox v. Koch
| Joseph L Cox, Jr |
| Ty Koch |
| 4:2011cv00771 |
| December 12, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| Tulsa Office |
| Osage |
| Claire V Eagan |
| T Lane Wilson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
118
OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan ; granting 74 Motion to Dismiss Party; granting 74 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 75 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting 76 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; finding as moot 115 Motion to Disqualify (Re: 34 Amended Complaint ) (RGG, Chambers)
|
|
Filing
38
OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan that Plaintiff's "motion to obtain leave of Court" (Dkt. # 33) is declared moot. Plaintiff's equal protection claim, as raised in Count II of the third amended complaint, is dismis sed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The Clerk shall issue the summonses provided by Plaintiff and deliver them, along with the USM-285s, five (5) copies of the third amended complaint (Dkt. # 34), and five (5) copies of this Order to the U.S. Marshal for service on Defendants. The agency responsible for the alleged civil rights violations as raised in Counts I and III of the third amended complaint shall prepare a Special Report as directed h erein. The Special Report and Defendants' answer(s) and/or dispositive motion(s) shall be filed no later than sixty (60) days from the date of service. The Special Report made in the course of this investigation shall be filed as a separate doc ument. No applications, motions, or discovery should be filed or considered until the steps set forth in this order have been completed, except as the Court further orders. Should Defendants file a dispositive motion(s), Plaintiff shall file a respo nse within twenty-one (21) days after the filing of Defendants' motion(s). Failure to file a response could result in the entry of relief requested in the motion. See LCvR 7.2(e),(f). ; Directing Service of Process; finding as moot 33 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief (Re: 34 Amended Complaint ) (RGG, Chambers)
|
|
Filing
5
OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Claire V Eagan directing plaintiff to cure deficiencies; Amended Complaint due 1/26/12 or matter will be dismissed; Plaintiff's request for new hearing in Osage County is dismissed; Clerk to send forms, setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): ( Miscellaneous Deadline set for 1/26/2012) (Re: 1 Complaint ) (RGG, Chambers)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cox v. Koch | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ty Koch | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Joseph L Cox, Jr | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
