Poore v. Glanz et al
| Ladona A Poore |
| Stanley Glanz and Seth Bowers |
| 4:2011cv00797 |
| December 23, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| Tulsa Office |
| Tulsa |
| Claire V Eagan |
| T Lane Wilson |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
310
OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge John E Dowdell Plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees (Doc. 239) is granted in part and denied in part. The Report and Recommendation regarding fees (Doc. 300) is accepted. A separate attorney fee Jud gment will be entered in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendants in accordance with the Opinion and Order ; accepting 300 Report and Recommendation; granting in part and denying in part 239 Motion for Attorney Fees (JED1, Chambers)
|
|
Filing
147
OPINION AND ORDER by Judge John E Dowdell ; granting in part and denying in part 46 Motion in Limine (Re: 145 Opinion and Order,, Setting/Resetting Deadline(s)/Hearing(s),,,, Ruling on Motion for Summary Judgment, ) (SAS, Chambers)
|
|
Filing
24
OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan ; denying 18 Motion to Dismiss; denying 18 Motion for More Definite Statement (Re: 2 Complaint ) (RGG, Chambers)
|
|
Filing
17
OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Claire V Eagan ; denying 4 Motion to Dismiss Party (Re: 2 Complaint ) (RGG, Chambers)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
