Garcia v. LaHood et al
| Jesse Garcia, Jr |
| Ray H LaHood and Michael P Huerta |
| 4:2012cv00019 |
| January 17, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| Tulsa Office |
| Tulsa |
| Paul J Cleary |
| James H Payne |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
60
OPINION AND ORDER by Judge John E Dowdell Defendants' Motion to Strike Improperly Filed Amended Complaint (Doc. 49) is granted. The Amended Complaint (Doc. 43) and the additional exhibits thereto (Doc. 46) are hereby stricken. The Court a ccepts, adopts, and affirms Judge Cleary's R&R (Doc. 35). The defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 9) is granted, and this action is hereby dismissed. This action is terminated. A separate Judgment will be entered forthwith. ; striking/terminating deadline(s)/Hearing(s); striking/withdrawing document(s); accepting 35 Report and Recommendation; finding as moot 44 Motion for Leave to File Document(s); granting 49 Motion to Strike Document(s); finding as moot 54 Motion in Limine; granting 9 Motion for Summary Judgment (Re: 46 Exhibit(s) in Support of Document(s), 43 Amended Complaint, 1 Complaint ) (Documents Terminated: 46 Exhibit(s) in Support of Document(s), 43 Amended Complaint ) (SAS, Chambers)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
