Randolph v. Chester
Michael David Randolph |
Claude Chester |
4:2012cv00165 |
March 23, 2012 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
Tulsa Office |
Comanche |
Claire V Eagan |
Frank H McCarthy |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan ; denying certificate of appealability; dismissing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241/2254); finding as moot 7 Motion to Stay; finding as moot 7 Motion to Dismiss; granting 8 Motion to Dismiss (RGG, Chambers) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Randolph v. Chester | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Michael David Randolph | |
Represented By: | Stanley Dwight Monroe |
Represented By: | Stephen G Layman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Claude Chester | |
Represented By: | Jay Schniederjan |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.