Johnson v. City of Tulsa, The et al
Edward Earl Johnson |
City of Tulsa, The and Eric J Hill |
4:2012cv00481 |
August 24, 2012 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
Tulsa Office |
Tulsa |
Claire V Eagan |
Frank H McCarthy |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 38 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge John E Dowdell ; denying 33 Motion to Amend (Re: 9 Amended Complaint ) (SAS, Chambers) |
Filing 24 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge John E Dowdell granting in part and denying part the City of Tulsa's motion to dismiss and denying defendant Eric Hill's motion to dismiss. ; setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): ( Miscellaneous Deadline set for 9/11/2014, Status Report due by 9/19/2014); granting in part and denying in part 14 Motion to Dismiss Party; denying 21 Motion to Dismiss (Re: 9 Amended Complaint ) (SAS, Chambers) |
Filing 8 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan that the City of Tulsa's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint and Brief in Support (Dkt. # 4) is granted. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint realleging his Section 1983 claim agains t the City no later than December 26, 2012. No later than December 26, 2012, plaintiff shall show good cause for his failure to serve Hill within 120 days of filing the petition. ; setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): ( Miscellaneous Deadline set for 12/26/2012); granting 4 Motion to Dismiss (Re: State Court Petition/Complaint ) (RGG, Chambers) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.