Zehren v. Thomas Energy Systems, Inc.

Defendant: Thomas Energy Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff: Roger Zehren
Case Number: 4:2012cv00689
Filed: December 21, 2012
Court: Oklahoma Northern District Court
Office: Tulsa Office
County: Tulsa
Referring Judge: Frank H McCarthy
Presiding Judge: James H Payne
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 29:621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 6, 2015 59 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Terence Kern ; granting in part and denying in part 38 Motion for Summary Judgment (vah, Chambers)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Zehren v. Thomas Energy Systems, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas Energy Systems, Inc.
Represented By: D Kevin Ikenberry
Represented By: Stephen Lawrence Andrew
Represented By: Renee Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roger Zehren
Represented By: Daniel E Smolen
Represented By: Miranda Rachelle Russell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.