Prejean v. Correctional Healthcare Companies, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Dolan Prejean
Defendant: Correctional Healthcare Companies, Inc., Correctional Healthcare Management, Inc., Correctional Healthcare Management of Oklahoma, Inc., Darryl Payton and Stanley Glanz
Case Number: 4:2013cv00111
Filed: February 21, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Office: Tulsa Office
County: Tulsa
Presiding Judge: John E Dowdell
Presiding Judge: Frank H McCarthy
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 18, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 65 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge John E Dowdell The dismissal motions (Doc. 5, 9, 18, 35) are granted. The First Claim of plaintiff's Complaint, asserted under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, is hereby dismissed with prejudice. The Second, Third, Fourt h and Fifth Claims of the Complaint, which assert claims under state law, are hereby dismissed without prejudice in accord with 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3). ; striking/terminating deadline(s)/Hearing(s); granting 35 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting 5 Motion to Dismiss; granting 9 Motion to Dismiss; granting 18 Motion to Dismiss Party (Re: 2 Complaint ) (SAS, Chambers)
April 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 58 OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Frank H McCarthy ; granting 40 Motion to Compel (tjc, Dpty Clk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Prejean v. Correctional Healthcare Companies, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dolan Prejean
Represented By: Robert Murray Blakemore
Represented By: Louis Werner Bullock
Represented By: Patricia Whittaker Bullock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Correctional Healthcare Companies, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Correctional Healthcare Management, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Correctional Healthcare Management of Oklahoma, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Darryl Payton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stanley Glanz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?